The fact that we can find pattern in the Universe is proof that existence is man-made.
Would a supremely intelligent being be satisfied with anything less than true randomness?
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Twitter
Posts
Posts
Of shoes -- and ships -- and sealing wax -- Of cabbages -- and kings -- And why the sea is boiling hot -- And whether pigs have wings.
About Me
- Falstaff
- Minneapolis, MN
- GB$(GL) d- s+:++ a C W+(++) w PS++ PE--(++) !tv b++++ DI++++ m++++ e++++ h+ r* z-->---
Recent Comments
Method to the Madness
Subscribe To
Posts
Posts
Site Meter
StatCounter
E-mail:
specktre@gmail.com
4 comments:
It is all getting there, though. Does that mean the supreme being is controlling the way things go?
I'd say the supremely intelligent designer loves balance. So both chaos and cosmos, in balanced measures.
Does it make sense for a supremely unintelligent being to try and set terms for what would satisfy a supremely intelligent being?
... Duh?
http://www.coffman.umn.edu/events/calendar/?event_id=7517
Poster sale. Found a lot of Van Gogh for nine dollars.
Post a Comment